Recently Time Out voted Cape Town the best city in the world. This was for the tourist and business visitor experience, though, not the reality of residents. Coincidentally, Kevin Bloom wrote an article in Daily Maverick titled "Sea Point's broken promises" about development and gentrification in the high-end suburb that's crowding out residents. He followed this with an interview with "combative" Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis who'd objected to the negative characterisation of the city regarding its development agenda. The concern about development in Cape Town crowding out locals is not new. Just last week I saw a comment to a YouTube podcast by a British traveller about Cape Town being the "best city in the world" following the Time Out nomination. In the comments a local complained development is making the city crowded and expensive and it sucks. Best for whom, I ask? In Bloom's interview Hill-Lewis compared Cape Town to Barcelona as touris...
The following explanation for South Africa's persistently high unemployment was posted on Reddit/AskSocialScience substack by a University of Cape Town MPhil PPE student. It's one of the more cogent I've encountered and unlike the trite reasons offered by government, media and mainstream analysts: This is a bit of a simplification, but essentially, the problem boils down to one of labour absorption: the private sector in SA is too small to employ the entire South African labour force. The reason for this can be traced back to the early development of the South African economy, specifically during the colonial and subsequent Apartheid era. Early industry in SA (here meaning mining) was developed around the exploitation of African labour, which was used as a readily available source of cheap labour to man a labour-intensive industry. Subsequent government policy largely backed this approach, setting up institutions like the homelands system as a means to provide a ready sou...